Texas Iron
7:56 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
Currently on 100kquid a week...
Roma also chasing him...
OK signing for 50k a week rolling 1 year contract...
does he have injury issues...???
|
Texas Iron
7:56 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
Currently on 100kquid a week...
Roma also chasing him...
OK signing for 50k a week rolling 1 year contract...
does he have injury issues...???
|
Texas Iron
7:56 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
Currently on 100kquid a week...
Roma also chasing him...
OK signing for 50k a week rolling 1 year contract...
does he have injury issues...???
|
Norflundon
7:53 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
Much better player than jenkinson but I do have my doubts as to wether you can keep him fit
|
Sven Roeder
7:41 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
He will be 31 at the start of next season and I'd quite happily take him and Jenkinson if possible. I'd probably play both of them on the right in some away games.
With young Hendry backing up Cresswell on the left and Reid & Tomkins supported by Collins , Henry , Burke and Oxford we will be pretty well covered.
|
stirlinghammer
7:40 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
Chelsea offered good money for him at the time.... as a young kid, he played really well in the run in of that relegation season...no tantrums or agents like lampard, defoe etc...
|
crapnotshit
7:35 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
swindon
first choice right back playing left back?
|
swindon hammer
7:33 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
Thought Johnson had a good game today and seems to be Liverpool's first choice right back again.
Would rather sign Jenkinson permanently or Trippier from Burnley due to their age but if we can't get either of them then Glen Johnson is a pretty good right back to bring in.
|
Honest Hammer
7:28 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
He is as good as Jenkinson and costing us nothing in transfer fee - freeing that cash up for another good signing.
He's better going forward than defensively, the notion that he isn't good enough is absolutely hilarious, he's just started for Liverpool against Chelsea.
|
RH
7:27 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
I was under the impression that Johnson never wanted to leave and was devastated they we had to sell him. Nothing like the way Defoe left at all
|
stirlinghammer
7:25 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
Very good cover for cresswell unless idiots on here want kung fu obrien
|
whufcroe
7:00 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
Not bad for an old boy Cough
|
Far Cough
6:58 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
The way I remember it, was that he left under no cloud at all and Chelsea paid the entire amount up front which at the time helped us considering our financial position.
|
whufcroe
6:55 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
"also I don't want him back after the way he left for Chelsea"
Oh go on then, this should be funny......
|
Alex V
6:52 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
I don't remember any controversy about the way he left for Chelsea.
As for this 'BFS signings' nonsense, there's always a benefit to getting service out of an experienced player as long as they're cheap enough and you don't overdo the amount of them. Although BFS might claim he invented the practice, we've had plenty of wonderful players join in the eve of their careers - Di Canio for a start.
|
toadinthehole
6:46 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
Why do we keep signing OAPs?
also I don't want him back after the way he left for Chelsea
FUCK OFF GLEN
|
Hermit Road
6:32 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
Glen Johnson is a fantastic player.
|
crapnotshit
6:27 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
A typical BFS signing
FUCK OFF
|
franksfat&slow&wank
6:24 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
27 games
Blimey I thought he'd missed more than that this season
|
Alex V
6:21 Sun May 10
Re: Glen Johnson
|
He's a very good player, there's no doubt about that imo. The worry is the wages and getting stuck with an older player on a long contract, that's all. A manageable wage on a two-year contract - that would be a great result for us.
|
| 
